← All Meetings
Regular — November 18, 2026
The Board was scheduled to hold a closed session on anticipated litigation, hear a presentation on Community Schools for 2026–27, and consider approval of a three-year collective bargaining agreement with CSEA, Chapter 5 (July 1, 2026–June 30, 2029). The agenda also proposed discussion of board and committee assignments, an enrollment and capacity engagement process, and a review of the Superintendent's Listening and Learning Tour, alongside 28 routine consent items covering policies, bond tracking, and operational agreements.
AI-generated summary — may contain errors. Not an official record.
📣 Verified Attendance & Public Comment Guide
How to Attend, Speak & Share This Meeting
Official Session Start Times
Open Session: 7:00 PM · Closed Session: 6:20 PM
Verified from the official agenda session items. Individual item clock times are not predicted because the Board may reorder items live.
In-Person Location & Remote Access
750 Bradford St, Redwood City, CA 94063
District Office Board Room & Zoom Webinar.
Public Comment (Section 9)
In person or via Zoom · 3 min
Agenda & non-agenda topics. Spanish interpretation available.
💻 Join Meeting on Zoom
✍ Speaker Sign-Up Form (English)✍ Speaker Sign-Up Form (Español)
💬 Share Notice on WhatsApp
Preview formatted notice text for parent groups & WhatsApp
*RCSD School Board Meeting (Regular)* 📅 November 18, 2026 · Open Session: 7:00 PM (Closed Session: 6:20 PM) 📍 In person: 750 Bradford St, Redwood City 💻 Zoom: https://rcsdk8-net.zoom.us/j/81129162279 🗣️ Public comment (Item 9): sign up before or at the start of the meeting: https://forms.gle/FV9cN9PhJVvfkdgu6 *Key agenda topics:* • 12.1: Community Schools Board Presentation 2026-2027 School Year • 13.1: Discussion of School Assignments and Committee Assignments for Board Members for the 2026–27 School Year • 13.2: Discussion of Enrollment and Capacity Studies Community Engagement Process Full agenda & latest official updates: https://rcsd.info/meetings/2026-11-18/
Official source: Simbli / GAMUT (checked 2026-11-14).
No transcript available for this meeting.
1Call to Order1min
1.1Roll CallProcedural
1.2Public Comment on Closed Session Items OnlyInformation
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThe Board will limit comments to Closed Session items and will only be accepted in person.
RationaleSpeaker cards are available at the entrance and can be submitted to the secretary before the meeting begins. Alternatively, you may raise your hand prior to the start of the meeting to indicate your desire to speak.
Financial ImpactNone.
3Announcement of Closed Session Purpose1min
4Closed Session–6:20 PM30min
4.1CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION–Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Gov. Code Section 54956.9: 1 case
5Reconvene to Open Session at approximately 7:00 PM1min
5.1Roll CallProcedural
5.2Report Out on Closed Session from November 18, 2026Procedural
6Welcome1min
6.1Notification of Meeting RecordingProcedural
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThe Board will notify the audience that the Board meeting will be audio-taped, broadcast, and recorded for the District's Recording Channel.
6.2Pledge of AllegianceProcedural
7Changes to the Agenda1min
8Approval of the Agenda (Action Required)1min
9Public Comment
9.1Labor Association CommentsInformation
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRCTA and CSEA labor association leaders/representatives are invited to speak to the School Board on agenda and non-agenda items. Comments are limited to 3 minutes per person per topic unless otherwise noted.
10Approval of the Bond Program Consent Items1min
10.1Approval of Measure T Bond Program Tracking List of Items Under $20kAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThe Bond Program Team recommends approval of Measure T Bond Program Tracking List of Items Under $20k. This list provides a summary of recently issued purchase orders that fall within the administrative approval threshold and are presented to the School Board for transparency and oversight.
RecommendationIt is the Bond Program Team's recommendation that the School Board approve the attached tracking list of items under $20k.
RationaleThis tracking sheet provides the School Board with all recent items $20k and under in a comprehensive list. This list will be sent to the School Board regularly as the POs are compiled.
Financial ImpactTotal: $11,581.50. Funding for this is provided through Budget Source: Fund 40 - Special Reserve Fund for Capital Projects.
10.2Approval of Change Order #5 for Athletic Field Restoration at Garfield Community School with Holt Renewables, LLC.Action (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThe Bond Program Team requests approval of Change Order #5 with Holt Renewables, LLC ($280,866.80; +13 days) to restore the Garfield Community School athletic field outside the solar project's construction limits. Work-subcontracted to Scapes, Inc.-includes grading, debris off-hauling, irrigation repairs, sand replacement, sod installation, and initial maintenance to return the field to safe, playable condition for students and the community.
RecommendationIt is the Bond Program Team's recommendation that the School Board approve Change Order #5 with Holt Renewables, LLC. for athletic field restoration at Garfield Community School.
RationaleConstruction activities associated with the Garfield Community School solar project have impacted portions of the existing athletic field and turf areas. Restoration of the field is necessary to return the site to a safe, functional, and maintainable condition for student and community use. The proposed restoration work will address soil compaction, grading deficiencies, irrigation performance, and turf replacement resulting from construction activities. The scope of work includes turf removal, soil preparation, laser grading, decompaction, off-hauling of unsuitable materials, irrigation system repairs and modifications, sand testing and replacement, sod installation, and maintenance necessary to establish healthy turf growth. To complete this work, Holt Renewables, LLC. will retain Scapes, Inc., an experienced athletic field restoration contractor. Under the terms of the change order, warranties associated with irrigation, grading, grass establishment, and field restoration performance will be provided directly between the District and Scapes, Inc., ensuring accountability for the completed restoration work. Approval of this change order will allow the District to restore the athletic field to pre-construction conditions, protect the District's investment in the facility, and return the field to full operational use for students and the community.
Financial ImpactOriginal Contract Total: $1,071,323.00 Net Change from Previous Change Orders (#1-#4): $13,248.07 Adjusted Contract Total Prior to CO #5: $1,084,571.07 Change Order #5 Total: $280,866.80 New Adjusted Contract Total: $1,365,437.87 Contract Schedule Impact: +13 Calendar Days Budget Source: Fund 40 - Special Reserve Fund for Capital Projects
11Bond Program Action Items
12School/Community Reports20min
12.1Community Schools Board Presentation 2026-2027 School YearInformation
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractPresentation on Community Schools and Partnership Department Model and Implementation in Redwood City School District (RCSD)(20-min report; 20-min Board discussion).
RationaleThe Community Schools team will present to the School Board and Superintendent Dr. Rubalcaba an overview of how RCSD's Community Schools & Partnerships Department strengthens collaboration among families, students, staff, and community partners through a long-term, relationship-based approach grounded in trust and shared responsibility. Guided by the four pillars of the Community Schools framework, the presentation will highlight department-wide data, growth opportunities, and grant-funded initiatives across all areas of the department, including Community Schools, Expanded Learning, and Mental Health services. It will also demonstrate how these efforts align with RCSD's district vision, priorities, and strategic plans, including the Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP). Through collaboration with families, schools, and community-based organizations, the department continues to strengthen whole-child supports and expand opportunities for student engagement, enrichment, and wellness. This integrated approach promotes district-wide alignment, advances educational equity, and supports student success by connecting academic achievement, mental health and wellness, and family and community engagement under a shared vision.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the School District at this time.
13Discussion Items15min
13.1Discussion of School Assignments and Committee Assignments for Board Members for the 2026–27 School YearDiscussion
2025-26 Committee Assignments for Board Members Final2025-26 School Assignments for Board Members2026-27 School Assignments for Board Members
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractTrustees will discuss the draft 2026-27 school site and committee assignments to ensure balanced district-wide representation. This item is for review and direction only, with the final assignments to be presented for formal approval at a subsequent meeting.
RationaleEach year, the Governing Board reviews and discusses school site and committee assignments to ensure equitable district representation, foster school community relationships, and maintain active participation on key inter-agency committees. School Site Rotations : Site assignments will rotate to provide trustees with broad, balanced engagement across all District campuses. Committee Appointments : Assignments will be reviewed and aligned according to trustee interest, professional availability, and District priorities. This item is for board discussion and direction only. Feedback and preferences shared tonight will be incorporated into a final list of assignments for formal adoption at an upcoming regular meeting. Attachments: 2026-27 School Assignments for Board Members ( Draft ); 2025-26 School Assignments for Board Members FINAL ( For Reference ONLY ) 2025-26 Committee Assignments for Board Members ( For reference and discussion purposes ).
Financial ImpactNo financial impact to the district.
13.2Discussion of Enrollment and Capacity Studies Community Engagement ProcessDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractSuperintendent Dr. Christian J. Rubalcaba presents to the Redwood City School District (RCSD) Board of Trustees the community engagement process for the Enrollment and Capacity Studies. Following the Board's direction on September 23, 2026, the district will conduct two studies, each with its own engagement process and timeline. The presentation describes the two studies, how families and staff will take part, and when the Board will be asked to act. This item is for information only and does not require Board action.
RationaleLike many districts across California, RCSD has seen enrollment decline in recent years. The district enrolled about 6,244 students at the start of 2026-27, and enrollment is projected to fall to about 5,302 by 2033-34. With 12,362 seats of total facility capacity, the district uses only about half of its space, and enrollment varies considerably from school to school. This creates an opportunity to plan proactively rather than react later: to strengthen educational programs, make the best use of our schools, and be responsible stewards of the resources our community provides. Following the 2026-27 Annual Enrollment and Capacity Review, the Board approved additional analysis and community engagement. The work is guided by two goals: strengthen educational opportunities so every student has equitable access to strong instruction, programs, and support, and align our facilities with enrollment and educational needs. The district will conduct two studies, each with its own engagement process and timeline. The Capacity and Equitable Middle School Access Study for Bayside Families will examine enrollment, capacity, and equitable middle school pathways for families in the Bayside community. The Specialized Program (Orion Alternative) and Small School Study will examine long-term demand for Orion Alternative's programs and the needs of our smaller schools. Because some schools take part in both studies, staff will consider how changes in one could affect the other. For the Bayside study, the district will meet families where they are, at morning parent meetings at their own schools. For the Orion and small school study, an advisory committee of parent and staff representatives from each participating school will meet regularly. To keep the community updated, the district will communicate during the process. A dedicated webpage will hold data, materials, and summaries, and after each round of meetings the district will share a bilingual update on what was presented, what we heard, and what happens next.
Financial ImpactThis presentation has no financial impact.
13.3Review of Superintendent’s Listening and Learning TourDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRedwood City School District (RCSD) Superintendent Dr. Christian J. Rubalcaba presents to the Board of Trustees the findings of his Listening and Learning Tour, a key part of his 90-Day Entry Plan. During the tour, Dr. Rubalcaba heard directly from families and staff both in person and through an online survey. Students also participated through the survey. The presentation shares what the RCSD community values, the hopes it expressed for RCSD schools, and how those hopes connect to the district's Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) goals. This item is for information only and does not require Board action.
RationaleAs part of his 90-Day Entry Plan, the Superintendent launched the Listening and Learning Tour to learn from the people RCSD serves as he launched his superintendent tenure in the school district. The tour included morning sessions for families and after-school sessions for staff at every school, a session with District Office and Maintenance, Operations, and Transportation staff (MOT) and online surveys in English and Spanish for families, staff, community members, and students. What's working: Across every group, participants expressed pride in caring teachers and staff, welcoming school communities, strong communication, enrichment and language programs, and the wraparound support offered through Community Schools. Students spoke warmly and highly about their teachers, their friends, and the activities that make school a place they want to be. Opportunities to grow: Participants also shared their hopes for RCSD schools: strong support for every student, rich academic programs, well-kept campuses, fresh and healthy meals, a balanced school day, teachers and staff who stay, and clear guidance on technology. Each group emphasized different hopes, and together they offer a clear picture of what matters most to the RCSD community. Connecting to district work: Many of these hopes connect directly to the district's Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) goals for engagement and school climate, English learner progress, and academic growth, and to the work already underway. Others are addressed through district operations. Questions about technology in the classroom will be taken up by an upcoming Superintendent's advisory committee. The findings have helped learn about RCSD's strengths as well as areas for opportunities.
Financial ImpactThis report has no financial impact.
14Approval of Consent Items (Action Required)1min
14.1Approval of the October 14 Board Meeting MinutesAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the School Board approve the October 14 Minutes for the Regular Board Meeting, as submitted.
RationaleThe board meeting minutes have been reviewed by the Clerk, Superintendent, and the Administration.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact.
14.2Approval of the Field Trip Request for Kennedy Middle School Student to Attend the Community Engagement Initiative Conference: December 3-4, 2026Action (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThis board memo is seeking approval for the field trip request for the Community Engagement Initiative Conference for Kennedy Middle School. This conference will allow the Kennedy team to collaborate and implement a targeted problem of practice while building local capacity for meaningful engagement.
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the School Board approve the field trip to Anaheim, CA from December 3-4 for the Community Engagement Initiative Conference for Kennedy Middle School. This conference will allow the Kennedy team to collaborate and implement a targeted problem of practice while building local capacity for meaningful engagement.
RationaleKennedy Middle School was selected as a Cohort VII participant for this initiative. The team will bring together district-level administrators, site administrators, teachers, a community school coordinator, a school site parent, a student, a community partner from Redwood City Together, and a representative from the San Mateo County Office of Education. Participation in the CEI Conference supports the district's goals by focusing on the following key areas: Identify effective community engagement models along with metrics to evaluate them. Build capacity within communities and school districts to lead difficult conversations centered on student outcomes. Establish strong peer-to-peer partnerships between school districts and county offices of education (CEOs) to enhance community involvement. Expand successful community engagement models across the state. Act as a facilitator, resource connector, capacity builder, and relationship builder to support school district community engagement goals. Attending this conference allows the Kennedy Middle School team to engage in an open dialogue on issues related to improving local pupil outcomes.
Financial ImpactThis activity will be funded by the Marin County Superintendent of Schools and the Marin County Office of Education Community Engagement Initiative.
14.3Approval of the Addendum to the Measure U Plan for Taft for the 2026-2027 School YearAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThese funds support schools in strengthening core academic skills, attracting and retaining quality teachers, enhancing arts and music programs, and updating classroom technology.
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the School Board read and approve Taft's Addendum to its 2026-2027 Measure U Plan.
RationaleFor Measure U, Taft was given an allotment for 2026-2027 of $90,508 and a carryover from 2025-26 of $43,594.00 for a total of $134,102.00. Taft's Site Council met on 10/26/2026 and approved its Measure U Addendum. The following are amendments proposed for Taft's Measure U Plan for the 2026-2027 school year: Increase funding from $1,100 to $5,000 for teacher release time and stipends to analyze assessment data and plan reading and mathematics instruction. Increase funding from $2,099 to $3,000 for science, math, music, PBIS, and author assemblies that enrich learning and promote a positive school culture. Increase funding from $1,000 to $4,000 for library books, materials, and reading incentives to strengthen literacy and support students in meeting their reading goals. Increase funding from $5,000 to $7,500 for field trip entrance fees and transportation to provide hands-on enrichment opportunities. Allocate $10,000 for Outdoor Education student scholarships, transportation, and teacher stipends to support access to hands-on science learning. Allocate $5,293 for teacher-led after-school tutoring to strengthen reading and mathematics skills for students needing additional support. Allocate $6,000 for weekend teacher planning and collaboration to improve instruction and support teacher retention. Allocate $4,500 for Next Gen Math for grades 3-5 and supplemental applications for second grade to strengthen mathematics skills. Allocate $2,500 for supplemental mathematics materials and workbooks to support student learning. All of the members in attendance at the 10/26/2026 School Site Council meeting voted to approve the recommendations. An updated plan for use of Measure U funds is attached for review.
Financial Impact$134,102.00 out of Measure U Site Funds
14.4Approval of the Addendum to the Measure U Plan for Garfield for the 2026-2027 School YearAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThese funds support schools in strengthening core academic skills, attracting and retaining quality teachers, enhancing arts and music programs, and updating classroom technology.
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the School Board read and approve Garfield's Addendum to its 2026-2027 Measure U Plan.
RationaleFor Measure U, Garfield was given an allotment for 2026-2027 of $75,807 and a carryover from 2025-26 of $95,033.58 for a total of $170,840.58. Garfield's School Site Council met on October 20, 2026 and approved its Measure U Addendum. The following are amendments proposed for Garfield's Measure U Plan for the 2026-2027 school year: Allocate $60,033.58 to fund a .5 FTE Guest Teacher to provide release time for grade-level and cross-grade-level collaboration to strengthen instruction across all subject areas. Allocate $20,000 to fund field trips and assemblies. This funding will support the fifth-grade Outdoor Education Science field trip, providing students with hands-on, real-world learning opportunities and an overnight educational experience. Additionally, funds will support educational assemblies for the entire school. Allocate $15,000 to provide every student in grades 1st-3rd with 10 take-home books aligned with their reading assessment scores, distributed eight times throughout the school year. This initiative will support the goal of ensuring all students read at grade level by the end of third grade. All of the members in attendance at the October 20, 2026, School Site Council meeting voted to approve the recommendations. An updated application for Measure U funds is attached for review.
Financial Impact$170,840.58 out of Measure U Site Funds
14.5Approval of Board Policy 4111: Recruitment and SelectionAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 4111: Recruitment and Selection.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
14.6Approval of Board Policy 4211: Recruitment and SelectionAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 4211: Recruitment and Selection.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
14.7Approval of Board Policy 4311: Recruitment and SelectionAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 4311: Recruitment and Selection.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
14.8Approval of Board Policy 4119.1: Civil and Legal RightsAction (Consent)
Policy 4119.1_ Civil And Legal Rights - Marked 11.18.26Policy 4119.1_ Civil And Legal Rights - Clean 11.18.26
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 4119.1: Civil and Legal Rights.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
14.9Approval of Board Policy 4219.1: Civil and Legal RightsAction (Consent)
Policy 4219.1_ Civil And Legal Rights - Marked 11.18.26Policy 4219.1_ Civil And Legal Rights - Clean 11.18.26
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 4219.1: Civil and Legal Rights.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
14.10Approval of Board Policy 4319.1: Civil and Legal RightsAction (Consent)
Policy 4319.1_ Civil And Legal Rights - Marked 11.18.26Policy 4319.1_ Civil And Legal Rights - Clean 11.18.26
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 4319.1: Civil and Legal Rights.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
14.11Approval of Board Policy 5020: Parent Rights And ResponsibilitiesAction (Consent)
Policy 5020_ Parent Rights And Responsibilities - Marked 11.18.26Policy 5020_ Parent Rights And Responsibilities - Clean 11.18.26
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 5020: Parent Rights And Responsibilities
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
14.12Approval of Board Policy 5125: Student RecordsAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 5125: Student Records.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
14.13Approval of Board Policy 5131.9: Academic HonestyAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 5131.9: Academic Honesty.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
14.14Approval of Board Policy 5145.3: Nondiscrimination/HarassmentAction (Consent)
Policy 5145.3_ Nondiscrimination_Harassment - Marked 11.18.26Policy 5145.3_ Nondiscrimination_Harassment - Clean 11.18.26
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 5145.3: Nondiscrimination/Harassment.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
14.15Approval of Board Policy 6159: Individualized Education ProgramAction (Consent)
Policy 6159_ Individualized Education Program - Marked 11.18.26Policy 6159_ Individualized Education Program - Clean 11.18.26
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 6159: Individualized Education Program.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
14.16Approval of Board Policy 6163.1: Library Media CentersAction (Consent)
Policy 6163.1_ Library Media Centers - Marked 11.18.26Policy 6163.1_ Library Media Centers - Clean 11.18.26
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 6163.1: Library Media Centers.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
14.17Approval of Board Policy 6162.5: Student AssessmentAction (Consent)
Policy 6162.5 - Student Assessment - Clean 11.18.26Policy 6162.5 - Student Assessment - Marked 11.18.26
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 6162.5: Student Assessment.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
14.18Approval of Board Policy 6163.4: Student Use of TechnologyAction (Consent)
Policy 6163.4 - Student Use of Technology - Clean 11.18.26Policy 6163.4 - Student Use of Technology - Marked 11.18.26
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 6163.4: Student Use of Technology.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
14.19Approval of Board Policy 3471: Parcel TaxesAction (Consent)
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 3471: Parcel Taxes.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
14.20Approval of Board Policy 7214: General Obligation BondsAction (Consent)
Policy 7214_ General Obligation Bonds - Marked 11.18.26Policy 7214_ General Obligation Bonds - Clean 11.18.26
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the Board approve Board Policy 7214: General Obligation Bonds.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
14.21Approval of Board Bylaw 9220: Governing Board ElectionsAction (Consent)
Bylaw 9220_ Governing Board Elections - Marked 11.18.26Bylaw 9220_ Governing Board Elections - Clean 11.18.26
Item details
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the Board approve Board Bylaw 9220: Governing Board Elections.
RationaleThe Policy Committee and District Staff met to review this Board Policy at a previous Policy Committee meeting. The Board of Trustees has requested that a marked version and a clean copy be attached to each board memo. The marked copy contains the edits reviewed by the Policy Committee. The red edits in the marked copy indicate changes from the CSBA. The highlighted texts indicated in the board policy are suggestions made by RCSD staff and the Policy Committee. The clean version contains no markups.
Financial ImpactNo financial impact on the District at this time.
14.22Approval of the Retirement Notification IncentiveAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractIn an effort to streamline staffing planning for the 2027-2028 school year and to assist in managing staffing reductions, it is the Administration's recommendation to offer an early retirement notification incentive.
RecommendationThe incentive will be available as outlined below for those employees who notify Human Resources in writing via the RCSD Retirement/Notice of Separation form, by the deadlines below. $2,000 (Two thousand dollars) to employees with 1-29 years of service completed as of June 2027; $5,000 for employees with 30+ years of service completed as of June 2027 All Certificated Employees: Notification deadline by 01/15/2027 | Retirement deadline by 06/30/2027 All Classified Employees: Notification deadline by 01/15/2027 | Retirement deadline by 08/15/2027
RationaleFor reference purposes, the following chart denotes the previous years' retirement notifications from employees: Notification Date Management Employees CSEA Employees RCTA Employees Received by 2/15/26 for the 2026-27 school year 2 6 13 Received by 2/15/25 for the 2025-26 school year 1 9 8 Received by 2/15/24 for the 2024-25 school year 1 6 4 Received by 2/15/23 for the 2023-24 school year 2 3 6 Received by 2/15/22 for the 2021-22 school year 5 10 6
Financial ImpactUp to $50,000 in the Unrestricted General Fund ending balance, depending on the number of notifications received by the deadline.
14.23Approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement between the Redwood City School District and After School Music Academy LLC for the 2026-2027 School YearAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThis amendment increases the original contracted amount to cover the additional costs associated with adding Folklorico and West African programming to the after-school programming at Garfield.
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the School Board approve the amendment to the agreement between the Redwood City School District and After School Music Academy LLC to provide after-school music enrichment for the 2026-27 school year, in an amount not to exceed $288,00.00.
RationaleThe agreement with After School Music Academy LLC, approved by the Board on October 18, provides 24 weeks of hands-on instructional programming tailored to site-specific needs across five partner organization sites (REACH, PAL, Casa Circulo Cultural, BGCP, and Siena Youth Center). The programming supports the Community Schools Department's goal of providing high-quality, culturally responsive enrichment activities for students enrolled in extended learning programs. This amendment is necessary to cover the additional costs associated with adding Folklórico and West African programming at Garfield. The amendment increases the contract by $69,120, bringing the total contract amount to $288,000. The expanded programming will be funded through the California Community Schools Partnership Program (CCSPP).
Financial ImpactThe contract amount is not to exceed $288,000.00. The funding will come directly from the California Community Schools Parntership Program (CCSPP) grant with no financial impact on RCSD general or concentrated funds. The school district is teh dicuial agent for the grant.
14.24Approval of the MOU between Redwood City School District and College of San Mateo for Pediatric Nursing Students for the 2026-2027 School YearAction (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThe approval of this MOU will allow Redwood City School District (RCSD) registered nurses to provide clinical hours to College of San Mateo (CSM) student nurse interns. The nursing interns provide support to school nurses by assisting in various health-related tasks, which allows them to be exposed to school nursing roles and responsibilities. CSM pediatric nursing students aim to provide quality care to local school children while accruing clinical experience and hours required for the course.
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the School Board approve the MOU for the College of San Mateo for Nurse Student Interns for the 2026-2027 school year.
RationaleCollege of San Mateo (CSM) offers a degree program in Licensed Vocational Nursing. As part of their program, pediatric student nurses complete a community or pediatric rotation in order to gain experience in the field of nursing. This MOU will allow CSM students to conduct their community or pediatric rotation in the Redwood City School District. CSM students will shadow Redwood City School District nurses and learn procedures to work in an educational setting. Services for this agreement will commence on November 19, 2026, and shall remain through June 30, 2027.
Financial ImpactThere is no financial impact for this agreement.
14.25Approval of the Second Amendment to the contract between Redwood City School District and Amergis Healthcare Staffing for the school year 2026-2027 to change the verbiage in the first amendment.Action (Consent)
Amergis 26.27 2nd Amendment Board 11.12.26Amergis 26.27 Amendment No. 1 Board 9.23.26Amergis 26.27 Agreement Board 8.10.26
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThis document outlines contract amendments with Amergis Healthcare Staffing, primarily updating verbiage to specify a $50 per hour bill rate for Behavior Technicians serving Redwood City School District.
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the School Board approve the Second Amendment to the contract with Amergis Healthcare Staffing to change the verbiage in the first amendment for the 2026-2027 school year.
RationaleAmergis Healthcare Staffing provides contracted staffing support to Redwood City School District (RCSD). The original contract approved on August 10, 2026, in the amount of $152,000, was for a Board Certified Behavior Analyst to provide behavior support services for staff and students in the district. On September 23, 2026, the first amendment was approved to increase the contract to $142,920, for a total of $294,920, to add two additional Behavior Technicians. This second amendment changes the verbiage to state that the two (2) Behavior Technicians (including potential substitute coverage) will be at a bill rate of $50 per hour.
Financial ImpactThere is no fiscal impact from this amendment.
14.26Ratification of Warrant Register, October 1, 2026 – October 31, 2026Action (Consent)
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThe attached report lists district expenditures totaling $ 5,665,708.16 for the period from October 1, 2026, to October 31, 2026, in accordance with Education Code Section 42631.
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the Board of Education ratify the attached warrant register as submitted.
RationalePursuant to Education Code Section 42631, all disbursements of district funds must be approved or ratified by written order of the Governing Board. The attached warrant register reflects all commercial check disbursements drawn on the San Mateo County Treasury for October 2026.
Financial ImpactThe total net disbursement from the San Mateo County Treasurer's Office was $ 5,665,708.16 across all district funds, summarized as follows: Fund 01 (General Fund): $4,601,041.90 Fund 12 (Child Development Fund): 12,335.27 Fund 13 (Cafeteria Fund): 167,990.48 Fund 14 (Deferred Maintenance Fund): 786.16 Fund 21 (Building Fund - Measure T): 279,200.36 Fund 25 (Capital Facilities Fund): 44,660.97 Fund 40 (Special Reserve Fund for Capital Outlay): 560,188.16 Gross Expensed Amount: $5,666,203.30 Less Unpaid Tax Liability Adjustments: -495.14 Total Net Disbursement: $5,665,708.16
15Action Items (Action Required)
15.1Approval of Intentional Technology for Empowered Learning CommitteeAction
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRedwood City School District (RCSD) Superintendent Dr. Christian J. Rubalcaba presents the launch of the Intentional Technology for Empowered Learning Committee (ITELC), an advisory committee and community engagement process on technology in the classroom. Technology was one of the strongest themes in the Superintendent's Listening and Learning Tour, and families and staff asked for clear, shared guidance. The committee will develop recommendations on technology use by grade level, a technology Board Policy, and parent and staff workshops in English and Spanish. The final recommendation will come to the Board on May 26 or June 9, 2027.
RecommendationStaff recommends that the Board of Trustees receive and approve the presentation on the Intentional Technology for Empowered Learning Committee.
RationaleDuring the Superintendent's Listening and Learning Tour, technology emerged as one of the community's strongest themes. Families hoped for healthy limits on screen time, especially for the youngest learners. Staff asked for clear, consistent guidance on technology and AI in the classroom. In response, Superintendent Dr. Rubalcaba is forming the Intentional Technology for Empowered Learning Committee, led by two principals and made up of parents and teachers from every school, with input from students. Rather than focusing only on screen time, the committee will look at how technology can support high-quality instruction and help students create, collaborate, and think critically. The committee will meet from January to May 2027, with community surveys and a Board study session along the way. Its work will lead to recommendations on technology use by grade level, a technology Board Policy, and workshops for parents and staff. Dr. Rucalcaba will bring the final recommendation to the Board on May 26 or June 9, 2027.
Financial ImpactThis presentation has no immediate financial impact.
15.2Approval of the Three-Year Successor Collective Bargaining Agreement with the California School Employees Association (CSEA), Chapter 5, and Acceptance of the AB 1200 Public Disclosure of Proposed Collective Bargaining Agreement (July 1, 2026 – June 30, 2029)Action
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThe Redwood City School District and the California School Employees Association (CSEA), Chapter 5, have reached a tentative three-year successor agreement covering July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2029. The agreement includes salary increases, adjustments to health and welfare benefits, and revisions to contract language. The associated AB 1200 Public Disclosure is attached for the Board's review.
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the Board of Education approve the three-year successor Collective Bargaining Agreement between the Redwood City School District and the California School Employees Association (CSEA), Chapter 5, for the period of July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2029, and accept the corresponding AB 1200 Public Disclosure of Collective Bargaining Agreement.
RationaleThe proposed agreement establishes compensation and working conditions for classified employees through June 30, 2029. The agreement includes salary and benefit adjustments intended to support recruitment and retention, along with updates to contract provisions. Approval will conclude negotiations for the successor agreement, subject to applicable reopeners.
Financial ImpactThe estimated financial impact of the agreement is $947,185 in fiscal year 2026-27, with an additional $803,688 in fiscal year 2027-28. The detailed multiyear fiscal impact is provided in the attached AB 1200 Public Disclosure.
15.3Discussion and Approval of the CSBA Delegate Assembly Nominations for Region 5BDiscussion
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractThe California School Boards Association (CSBA) has opened nominations for the 2027-2029 Delegate Assembly term for Subregion 5B (San Mateo County), with elected trustees serving a two-year term from April 1, 2027, through March 31, 2029. Governing boards may nominate one or more eligible trustees within the region through formal board action. All board nominations and candidate acceptance materials must be certified and submitted via CSBA's electronic Simply Voting platform by Thursday, January 7, 2027. (15-min Board discussion and action)
RecommendationIt is the Administration's recommendation that the Board of Education: Determine whether to nominate one or more eligible candidate(s) for the CSBA Delegate Assembly representing Subregion 5B; Take formal action by majority vote to approve the nomination(s), or take no action; and Authorize the Superintendent or Superintendent's Designee to certify the board's action and submit the approved nomination(s) via the CSBA Simply Voting electronic portal prior to the January 7, 2027, deadline.
RationalePolicy Representation & Regional Voice : The Delegate Assembly serves as CSBA's core policy-making body, establishing statewide policy platforms, electing state officers and directors, and guiding legislative advocacy on public school finance and governance. Subregion 5B encompasses San Mateo County school districts. Regional Voice : Participating in nominations ensures our region and local communities have dedicated representation advocating for public school needs at the state level. Incumbent Seats & Vacancies : Subregion 5B has three elected seats expiring on March 31, 2027, held by Gregory Land (San Mateo Union HSD), Mele Latu (Ravenswood City ESD), and Andrew Lie (Jefferson Union HSD). The remaining three elected seats in Region 5B continue through 2028. Eligibility & Selection : Any sitting trustee from a CSBA member district within Subregion 5B is eligible. Individual trustees cannot self-nominate; official ballot placement requires formal action by a member board. The Board may nominate as many eligible individuals as it deems appropriate. Nominee Commitments & Submission Protocol : CSBA conducts nominations and balloting exclusively via its Simply Voting portal. Following board nomination, each nominee must independently accept the nomination and submit biographical responses through the portal by January 7, 2027. Elected delegates are required to attend two annual meetings (scheduled for May 15-16 and November 29-30, 2027).
Financial ImpactNone. There is no cost associated with submitting nominations or participating in the CSBA Delegate Assembly nomination process.
16Board and Superintendent Reports10min
17Information
17.1Redwood City School District Review of Rocketship Redwood City's Unaudited Actuals for Fiscal Year 2025-26Information
Rocketship FY 2025-26 Unaudited Actuals Review Letter - signedRocketship RC 2025-26 Unaudited Actuals Board
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRCSD completed its review and issued findings on Rocketship Redwood City's Unaudited Actuals for 2025-26.
RationaleAs the authorizing agency for Rocketship Redwood City, the Redwood City School District (RCSD) maintains fiscal oversight responsibilities, which include monitoring the charter school's financial operations to ensure long-term fiscal solvency and stability. The attached letter from RCSD provides a summary of the District's review and findings regarding Rocketship Redwood City's Unaudited Actuals for the 2025-26 fiscal year.
Financial ImpactNone.
17.2Redwood City School District Review of KIPP Excelencia's Unaudited Actuals for Fiscal Year 2025-26Information
KIPP FY 2025-26 Unaudited Actuals Review Letter - signedKIPP Excelencia 2025-26 Unaudited Actuals Board
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRCSD completed its review and issued findings on KIPP Excelencia's Unaudited Actuals for 2025-26.
RationaleAs the authorizing agency for KIPP Excelencia, the Redwood City School District (RCSD) maintains fiscal oversight responsibilities, which include monitoring the charter school's financial operations to ensure long-term fiscal solvency and stability. The attached letter from RCSD provides a summary of the District's review and findings regarding KIPP Excelencia's Unaudited Actuals for the 2025-26 fiscal year.
Financial ImpactNone.
17.3Redwood City School District Review of Connect Community Charter School's Unaudited Actuals for Fiscal Year 2025-26Information
Item details
Quick Summary / AbstractRCSD completed its review and issued findings on Connect Community Charter School's Unaudited Actuals for 2025-26.
RationaleAs the authorizing agency for Connect Community Charter School, the Redwood City School District (RCSD) maintains fiscal oversight responsibilities, which include monitoring the charter school's financial operations to ensure long-term fiscal solvency and stability. The attached letter from RCSD provides a summary of the District's review and findings regarding Connect Community Charter School's Unaudited Actuals for the 2025-26 fiscal year.
Financial ImpactNone.
18Correspondence1min
19Other Business/Suggested Items for Future Agenda1min
26-27 Schedule of Board Agenda ItemsParking Lot of Ideas - Redwood City School Distict, 2026-2027 ONGOING
20Board of Trustees Meeting Reflection5min
21Board of Trustees Meeting Calendar1min
22Adjournment (Action Required)
Minutes not yet approved for this meeting.